9MM Gun Vs .45 Colt

Pretty much a simple little survey of sorts. Wemagazine. Don't know if it's been worked out, but it
currently have the M9 (Beretta 92FS 9mm) as thecould be a major problem. I have both 9mary ammo
standard issue side arm for most military MOS's.and a 45cal. prefer the 45 over the 9mary ammo.
There's no substitute for the old Colt 45, but if youHave concealed weapon permit, I carry the 45cal. My
happen to find a 9mm Luger and the extractor and45 is over 33 years old and still shoot like it was
the ejector don't break, well there's just somethingbrand new. I go through a box of ammo for each
about the Luger that is magnificent! I guess I'm justevery month. .45 calibers. The premiere
one of those people that think, if you're using a sidemans-stopping round, proven over and over as an
arm, someone is too close and you need to knockexcellent heavy pistol round since 1911.
them down. Ill takes stopping power over velocityI think the .40 cal was a compromise, going up to the
any day.10mm, but the .45 was designed to drop a
You can hit target on the earlobe with a .45cal anddrug-crazed terrorist (also known as a Moro
knock it flat. If the police had .45s instead of 9mm intribesman in the Muslim influenced areas of the
the Hollywood shootout, they would not have had toPhilippines'). I say bring them back. I have witnessed
get rifles from a gun store. It might not have gonewhat the 9mm doesn't do. .45 any day. While the
thru the armor but would have knocked them flatvenerable 45 was, in fact, designed to knock down
and let them close. Just ask the FBI about their tragicthe original uppity Muslims and almost 100 years later
1986 Miami shootout. On the linked chart note theis still relevant. On a personal note, I could never
weapons of agents Grogan and Dove, the twoqualify above Sharpshooter with it. With the M9, I
agents who lost their lives in the gun battle. Thegot Expert the first time out and every shoot
agents had to shoot the two suspects several timesafterwards.
to bring them down--none of the FBI agents involvedThe Beretta 92F was brought in because the US
were armed with .45 caliber weapons.needed to maintain the bases in Italy. It was very
As I understand it we converted to 9mm in order tosimply a "Quid Pro Quo." No studies were done, no
conform to NATO. In my opinion it was a ridiculousone's opinion was asked, the change was simply
compromise. The purpose of a side arm is to defenddone. No military member I have asked would take a
yourself in close quarters. A 9mm will injure an9mm over a .45. Many people I talked to owe their
adversary, but leave him active enough to possiblylives to the .45.
still do you harm. 45cal. on the other hand will disableI've also heard that .45s are like gold over in Iraq, as
the individual most entirely. Made by Colt or whoeversoldiers there are trying to get their hands on one
the 45. Is superior for flat out stopping power andbecause the 92F doesn't do the job. The only way a
NATO should have conformed to us. . 45 bring 'them9mm can stack up to the .45 in stopping power is if
back alive. Beretta is mucho regretted.you're using Black Talon or Gold Dot hollow-point
I've also heard that the model 92 Beretta has aammo. However I have heard these two brands of
problem with not chambering the final round in itsammo are now restricted.