Low Intelligence and Crime

As teachers in low income areas, we have anegative labels to children with a low IQ? Should the
tremendous responsibility. Many of our studentsattention concentrate on working within the families
come from poor families and there is some questionwhen they are unable or unwilling to educate their
regarding the relationship between a low IQ and achildren properly? Or should a global approach be
higher rate of crime on the one hand, and theattempted to make sure that low IQ children
relationship between poverty and delinquency on thebetween the ages of 4 and 10 receive all the
other. Are some teenagers more likely to commitnecessary opportunities to develop their own skills
crimes because of their low IQ and/or theirand an adequate social identity?
low-income situation or is the cause somethingResearch May Be the Answer
different altogether? Some experts believe thatLet us for the moment imagine an ideal scenario, free
schools may have a responsibility when they label lowfrom all political, religious and financial restraints: Our
IQ students as such while still in elementary, thusfirst task is to develop a trustworthy scale of
fomenting resentment and low self-esteem. Weintelligence that does not discriminate between
know however without a doubt that most studentschildren whatever their background may be. Second,
with limited intelligence know the difference betweenset up teams of social experts in each school district,
right and wrong; they cannot use the low IQ as anmaking sure that retired teachers who have been
excuse for criminal behavior.selected by their peers as outstanding mentors are
Are Broken Families Responsible?included with the all-important mission of gaining the
If the families are unable or unwilling to foment thetrust of the selected children (those with a low
adequate socialization process in their children, it is theintellectual level). Third, establish a baseline for each
schools' responsibility to not only impart academicstudent to determine weekly progress in academics
knowledge but also to model the acceptable socialand social issues. Fourth, give the children the
behavior which eventually leads to success in adultfreedom to select their favorite activities within a
life. Many unruly students struggle with a poorlycarefully arranged "menu." Finally, thoroughly evaluate
developed social identity due to abuse and/or lack ofeach child at the end of the school year with a full
proper opportunities. Despite valiant attempts bypanoply of reliable psychological instruments. This
public schools' teachers to socially educate theircould easily be conducted as a research project from
students, the classroom instructor doesn't have thewhich valuable conclusions could be drawn as to
time or the tools to attend to all personal needs. Awhich interventions are most effective.
change of educational model is thus needed in whichNo More Wasted Lives
specialized personnel would analyze each case andWe cannot afford to waste so many young lives
supply the proper attention and help. The short-termwho believe that the only solution to their plight is a
cost would be high but let's consider how muchlife of crime; even low functioning students have
higher the cost is on a long-term basis: prison, crime,some abilities that can be developed for the good of
police, judges and lost lives are a price that we havesociety and their own. Most of them hunger for
to pay every day because a child did not receiverecognition of their worth as human beings; once
proper attention when he or she could still bethey have been submitted to the nefarious influence
influenced positively.of hardened criminals in jail, it may be too late to
So Many Questions and So Few Answerseffectively change their behavior. The social
The burning questions remain valid: Does lowintervention must be at an early age, when most
intelligence, when added to poverty, increase thehuman beings develop a social identity and an
probability that a child will eventually lead a criminaladequate level of confidence in their own skills. We
life? Or does the low level of intelligence make itcould do a lot for the cost of a new bomber without
more likely for the criminal to be caught? Do publicputting our national security in danger. Why not do it
schools contribute to the problem by attributingnow?