Police and Stun Guns - What is Good Enough For Police Should Be Good Enough For the Average Citizen

We recently had a customer order a stun gun thennight to a parking lot. In this case, the person should
decide not to purchase it because a police officerhave it out and be ready to use it in case someone
told her they were useless. My questions for herapproaches and attacks from the rear. All it would
were:take in that case is raising the hand with the gun and
1. On what research did this police officer base hisstunning them on the neck, chest or wherever you
information?can reach, and keep stunning until he drops. In this
2. If they are useless, why do most police forcessituation of being attacked from behind, a taser
have their officers carry a Taser/stun gun?would not be as effective
3. If they are so useless, why is the Chicago policeWill it work? You bet. A half second shock will repel
force using a federal grant to purchase stun gunsand startle the attacker. One to two seconds will
with cameras on the end (to ensure NO misuse bycause the muscles to spasm and become difficult for
officers) for every police officer on their force?him to move, create grogginess and mental
4. Why are some states now enforcing laws on theirconfusion. Three seconds or more causes loss of
police force to restrict their use for the purpose ofbalance, lack of muscle control, mental confusion and
compliance and can only be used if someone isdisorientation. So would you be better off in this
threatening or causing harm to himself or another,situation with a stun gun in your hand or no defense
and limiting the number of times they can stun anat all? I can not understand why any police official
individual?would discourage anyone, especially a female, from
After looking at these questions, do they soundhaving some means of protection. Before you take
useless to you?anyone's word for this, however, do a little research
Yes, Police officers usually carry tasers, but these areyourself. Then ask yourself the question, "Would I
usually cost prohibitive for the average citizen.want to depend on my own strength as a means of
Although they have some differences, they basicallyself defense or do I want to have some product on
operate on the same principle. The biggest differenceme that can help me knock down an assailant long
affecting personal use is, a taser can shoot out itenough for me to run to safety and get help?"
electrodes from a distance of at least 15 feetThe most important thing to remember is what is
keeping the assailant at bay whereas a stun gun callsbest for you in your situation. We have one client
for contact with the assailant.who carries pepper spray clipped to her, our double
What people need to realize is that each person'strouble stun gun in her hand and an electronic whistle
situation may call for a different type of self defensearound her neck when she runs. She has been
product. Sure, using a stun gun (not a taser) meansassaulted before and doesn't plan to be again; she
you must have contact with the person. Therefore, Ialso doesn't plan to give up her passion for running.
would consider a stun gun being useful for someone,We can't stop living our lives, But we can become
for example, who has to walk from a building late atempowered to be safe, wise and protected.