Security Cameras Catch Criminals

Many advocates claim security cameras arethemselves. The presence of cameras and readily
ineffective weapons against crime. Despite theaccessible digital footage frequently leads to a
multitude of research studies that show reducedspeedy arrest of the perpetrator. Since there are so
crime rates in regions under surveillance these fewmany cameras on the streets and in buildings, many
people are still not convinced. One study of cartimes police can retrace a criminal's steps providing
parking garages showed a 51% reduction of criminalthem with an excellent profile of the suspect or his
acts. Security cameras are an integral part of policeidentity. In the example above police were able to
investigation and special police units are dedicated tolocate footage of the criminal approaching the building
their use. Often officers with special training arefrom a gas station across the street. Other cameras
monitoring 50-60 cameras at a time in a single room,in the gas station spotted the assailant purchasing
which can be a monotonous ordeal, as camera feedscigarettes with his credit card and obtained his
rotate through monitors every 5 - 10 seconds.identity. He was apprehended immediately. Video
However, anti surveillance activists frequently pointfootage is excellent evidence of the crime and will
to situations and circumstances where these unitslikely lend for a speedy trial and conviction.
failed to respond when a crime was being committed.People are people and sadly they make mistakes.
In one such example a woman was assaulted atImprovements in security technology are vastly
knife point while inside her apartment buildingclosing the human error gap with image recognition.
monitored by approximately 200 security cameras.These high tech surveillance cameras can recognize
She was forced into a stairwell where there were noitems such as a gun or knife, as well as suspicious
cameras and raped. To use the horrendous nature ofbehaviors and criminal acts such as vandalism and
events like these to lobby against security cameras isassault. Absolutely nothing should replace personal
unfounded. Cameras did not record the crime itself,common sense. One should always be aware of their
but did observe the struggle in the hallways.surroundings and never take personal safety for
What are the alternatives? What would be foolgranted.
proof? Greater physical presence of police andAdvances in technology have brought about much
security guards? What are the chances securityhigher quality cameras at reduced prices making it a
personnel patrolling the grounds would have stumbledviable option for almost any homeowner to have
upon the crime in progress, especially since none ofindoor and outdoor video surveillance. Wireless
the residents heard or reported anything? If guardssurveillance cameras are quickly becoming the popular
had missed the crime what options would police havechoice since they are so easy to install. These
to follow up with other than slowly taking the victimscameras can be quickly installed since there are no
description of the suspect and developing a sketch.holes to drill and wires to run. Monitored security
While these are terribly unfortunate events, justsystems will dispatch security agents and notify
because a crime is committed under surveillance doespolice immediately.
not mean there is a problem with cameras